Basics of Bible Interpretation

Figures of Speech

One of the most enlightening aspects of language is the study of figurative

Milton Terry introduces us to this subject with keen insight:

The natural operations of the human mind prompt men to trace analogies
and make comparisons. Pleasing emotions are excited and the imagination
is gratified by the use of metaphors and similes. Were we to suppose a
language sufficiently copious in words to express all possible conceptions,
the human mind would still require us to compare and contrast our concepts,
and such a procedure would soon necessitate a variety of figures of speech.
So much of our knowledge is acquired through the senses, that all our abstract
ideas and our spiritual language have a material base. “It is not
too much to say,” observes Max Muller, “that the whole dictionary
of ancient religion is made up of metaphors. With us these metaphors are
all forgotten. We speak of spirit without thinking of breath,
of heaven without thinking of sky, of pardon without
thinking of a release, of revelation without thinking of
a veil. But in ancient language every one of these words, nay, every
word that does not refer to sensuous objects, is still in a chrysalis stage,
half material and half spiritual, and rising and falling in its character
according to the capacities of its speakers and hearers.” (1)

What potent possibilities, then, lie in concepts conveyed by figurative
language! So, moving to specifics, let’s explore the various figures of
speech. I’ll list some of them, along with illustrations of their use on
the following pages.

Figures of Speech

 SIMILE(similis = like) A formal comparison using “asso” or “like”
to express resemblance. “Even so, husbands should love their
own wives as their own bodies…” (Eph. 5:28).
 METAPHOR(Meta + phero = a carrying over) An implied comparison, a word applied to something it is not, to suggest
a resemblance. “Benjamin is a ravenous wolf
(Gen. 49:27).
 IRONY(Eiron = a dissembling speaker) The speaker or writer says the very opposite of what he intends to convey.”
are the people and wisdom will die with you”
(Job 12:1).
 METONYMY(Mesa + onoma = a change of name) One word is used in place of another to portray some actual relationship
between the things signified.“Kill the Passover…
. 12:21 KJV) where the paschal lamb is meant.
 HYPERBOLE(Huper + bole = a throwing beyond) Intentional exaggeration for the purpose of emphasis, or a magnifying beyond
reality. “If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and
throw it away…”
(Matt. 5:29).
 PERSONIFICATION(To make like a person) Inanimate objects are spoken of as persons, as if they had life. “The
sea looked and fled
(Ps. 114:3, 4).
 APOSTROPHE(apo + strepho = to turn from) Turning from the immediate hearers to address an absent or imaginary person
or thing. “Ah, sword of the Lord! How long till you are quiet?”
(Jer. 47:6).
 SYNECDOCHE(sun + ekdechomai to receive from and associate with) Where the whole is put for a part, or a part for the whole, an individual
for a class and vice-versa. “And we were in all 276 souls
in Acts 27:37, where soul is used for the whole person.



First, let’s compare simile and metaphor. Ephesians 5:2227 is a simile,
making a formal comparison between Christ and the church on the one hand,
and husbands and wives on the other. The words “as…so” or “even
so” make this very clear. And this figure heightens our interest and
dignifies the marriage relationship, especially if we see it in outline
form, like this:

 CHRIST LOVED THE CHURCH and gave HIMSELF up for her…Eph.
THAT he might sanctify her” (Eph. 5:26) i.e. that we
might be put to the intended use for which he created us:a) as an expression of his own LIFE and CHARACTER.

b) to fulfill our calling, enjoy our God-given ministries.

c) and much more (you add the rest.)

THAT the husband might sanctify his wife. i.e. that she might SHARE HIS
LIFE, be his helper, etc.a) expressing her own personality and life in Christ.

b) employing her gifts in a spiritual ministry.

c) be the ruler of the home, in all that means to her husband
and children.

 “THAT he might present the church to himself in splendor”
(Eph. 5:27) i.e. that he might enjoy the benefits stemming from his
unselfish love– in enjoying his Bride. And lead us on to the fulfillment
of our manhood and womanhood by his love.
THAT the husband might seek his wife’s fulfillment, and enjoy her. i.e.
that he may enjoy the beauty and glory of her fulfilled womanhood, as he
undertakes the responsibility of his headship–leading her with the leadership
of love to ultimate fulfillment.
 “THAT she might be holy and without blemish” (Eph.
5:27). i.e. that his work in us may go on to completion, that we may be
wholly his.
 THAT the husband be faithful, hanging in there. i.e. that his commitment
may be steadfast and permanent, in spite of problems.
 “Having cleansed her by he washing of water
with the word”
(Eph. 5:26) Based on COMMUNICATION which
his loving heart initiates–to keep us close, mutually enjoying our love
Husbands are to keep communication channels open, remembering that LOVE
finds a way to COMMUNICATE, and it’s his initiative
if he is going to



By contrast, a metaphor is not so straightforward. It communicates an
impression more by implication. In the expressions, “You are the
salt of the earth
” (Matt. 5:13) and “You are
the light of the world”
(Matt. 5:14), our Lord Jesus is multiplying
metaphors to communicate graphic truth about the determinative role Christians
are to play in affecting the world. In those early days, salt was the major
means of arresting corruption in meat or fish, so the figure is not lost
on those who listened to Jesus. Light, in any age, enables us to function
with any degree of confidence. It dispels darkness. When we can’t see, we’re
in trouble! The words “salt” and “light” are used as
implied comparison. These metaphors speak with penetrating force, even though
they are implicit in nature.


The use of irony as a figure of speech, though it has a bite to it, often
has its humorous side. Our Lord was using both effects when he said, “…how
can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is
in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye?”
(Luke 6:42).

In 1 Corinthians 4:8 the apostle Paul uses irony with great force, “Already
you are filled! Already you have become rich! Without us you have become
kings! And would that you did reign, so that we might share the rule with
you.” As we read on, Paul proceeds to contrast the state of the apostles
as being the last–not the first, as spectacles to the world, as fools.
Then he uses irony again, “We are fools for Christ’s sake, but you
are wise in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You are held in honor,
but we in disrepute” (1 Cor. 4:10). Can you imagine how the Corinthian
Christians must have felt the shame of their misplaced value systems, how
this pointed word of sarcasm must have punctured their swollen pride in
men? Would that we should review our value systems, today, and discover
the only ground of boasting–the Lord Jesus and his life in us.


Then there’s metonymy (a change of name). Speaking to the Pharisees concerning
Herod, Christ says “Go and tell that fox” (Luke 13:32)
end with one word he characterized that politically crafty king. And, “The
way of the fool is right in his own eyes…” (Prov. 12:15) where eyes
represents the way he sees things, or his mental perspective. And, “…the
of the wise brings healing” (Prov. 12:18) in which tongue
stands for what the wise one says, his words of wisdom.

In the New Testament, “Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea
and all the region about the Jordan…” (Matt. 3:5 ) in which it is
obvious that people, not places, are meant in the mention of these
various regions. Then, we look at “You cannot drink the cup of the
Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord
and the table of demons” ( 1 Cor. 10:21). Here cup and table
are used for what they contain and what they offer. Again, in Romans
3:30 the circumcision is used to represent the Jewish people, while
uncircumcision refers to the Gentiles.

I’m sure from these examples you can see how commonly metonymy is used
in the Bible. We use the same figure today when we call a person “a
tiger” or “a kitten.”


Painting a picture larger than life by intentional exaggeration beyond
reality is a common feature of our own speech, so hyperbole (a throwing
should be thoroughly familiar to us.

In the anguish of his torment Job indulges in this kind of language.
More graphically than any other form of speech it expresses the awfulness
of his feeling of affliction.

And now my soul is poured out within me;

days of affliction have taken hold of me.

The night racks my bones,

and the pain that gnaws me takes no rest.

With violence it seizes my garment;

it binds me about like the collar of my tunic.

God has cast me into the mire,

and I have become like dust and ashes.

I cry to thee and thou cost not answer me;

I stand, and thou cost not heed me.

Thou hast turned cruel to me;

with the might of thy hand thou cost persecute me.

Thou liftest me up on the wind, thou makest me ride on it,

and thou tossest me about in the roar of the storm.

Yea, I know that thou wilt bring me to death,

and to the house appointed for all living (Job30:1-23).

Certainly we get the keen sense of his utter despair from this highly
expressive, but extravagant, language.

The apostle John in the New Testament uses hyperbolic language in this
statement: “But there are also many other things which Jesus did; were
every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not
contain the books that would be written” (John 21:25). If we considered
Christ’s eternal existence, perhaps this statement could be taken literally,
but if we limit it to the deeds of the Lord

Jesus in his humanity (which I believe is what John has in mind) then
it is clearly a use of hyperbole.


Referring to inanimate objects as if they possessed life and personality
is especially evident in the language of imagination and feeling. In Numbers
16:32, “…the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up…”
speaks of Korah and his men. Here the earth is personified as having a mouth
to devour these men.

The Lord Jesus uses personification in, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
killing the prophets and stoning those who are sent to you! How often would
I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under
her wings, and you would not!” (Matt. 23:37). The city of Jerusalem
is here personified. Our Lord’s concern was for its people, yet he addresses
the city as if it were they.

Again, our Lord personifies tomorrow in these words: “Therefore
do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself”
(Matt. 6:34). Here tomorrow is invested with characteristics of human
personality, as being beset with anxious cares.


This is a strange but graphic figure which sounds as if the speaker were
talking to himself in a sort of externalized soliloquy. For instance, David
says to his dead son, “O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! Would
I had died instead of you, O Absalom, my son, my son!” (2 Sam. 18:33).
What a moving expression of David’s grief this is; no other mode of expression
could be quite so expressive in this instance.

Then there is the use of this figure in which the kings of earth address
a fallen city, “Alas! alas! thou great city, thou mighty city, Babylon!
In one hour has thy judgment come!” (Rev. 18:10).

This figure of speech seems best adapted to the expression of deep emotion.
As such, it readily grabs our attention and draws out our interest.


Here’s one most of us never heard of, but which we frequently use in
everyday speech. We say, “This is his hour” when we don’t really
mean an hour just sixty minutes long. We mean this is his time of glory,
or suffering, or whatever we associate with his current experience. We have
substituted a part for the whole. In scripture it occurs in such passages
as this: in Judges 12:7 we are told Jephthah was buried “in the cities
of Gilead” (Hebrew) though actually only one of those cities is meant;
in Luke 2:1 “all the world” is used to mean the world of the Roman
Empire, in Deuteronomy 32:41 “if I whet the lightning of my sword”
the word lightning is used for the flashing edge of the gleaming

Perhaps now we have seen enough of the prevalence and expressive value
of figures of speech to help us appreciate the color and realism they lend
to the language of the Bible. Also, interpretively, our review should take
some of the mystery out of our encounters with these forms, in studying
the Bible.


  1. Milton S. Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan
    Publishing House, n.d.), p. 244.

Go to Phase 2: Chapter 8         Go to Table of Contents


Please visit our Donation Page



%d bloggers like this: